I’m Ready to Be Automated
How AI can shift supply and demand—perhaps with benefits for everyone.
I’m Ready to Be Automated
Edmon de Haro
Would a New Policy on Pot Be Good for the US?
Economists consider the societal impact of reclassifying marijuana.
- August 08, 2024
- CBR - Clark Center Panels
Marijuana may soon be getting a dramatic regulatory makeover in the United States. In May, the US Department of Justice submitted a proposal to reclassify marijuana from a Schedule I drug—a status it shares with heroin and LSD—to a Schedule III drug. The move wouldn’t legalize marijuana for recreational use but would put it in the company of substances such as ketamine and anabolic steroids, which are considered to have moderate to low potential for dependency. It would also recognize marijuana as a drug with accepted medical applications and could affect the tax status of marijuana companies in states where pot is legal.
Would the effects of such a change be generally beneficial for society? To consider this question, Chicago Booth’s Kent A. Clark Center for Global Markets polled its US panel of economic experts.
Daron Acemoglu, MIT
“Legalizing marijuana in places where it’s illegal, without interfering with state policies that have already legalized it, would be an improvement. There is no evidence that legalization has led to big negative effects, and further legalization would reduce criminal involvement.”
Response: Agree
Judith Chevalier, Yale
“My understanding is that the compliance costs required for research labs to study the efficacy and harms of Schedule I drugs are much higher than for Schedule III. Lowering the barriers to such studies, given the widespread use of cannabis under state laws, seems a worthy policy goal.”
Response: Agree
Erik Hurst, Chicago Booth
“Most states already allow medical marijuana use. So, in most states, it will have no effect. It may be best to decriminalize completely.”
Response: Disagree
Fiona Scott Morton, Yale
“The relative dangers of these drugs are now well known. Marijuana is legal in many states.”
Response: Agree
Nancy Stokey, University of Chicago
“Direct effects: lower costs for sellers through a tax change, and an upward shift in demand. Hence, sales will increase, leading to more and better targets for armed robberies, since it will still be a cash-only business. There will be winners and losers. On net, ambiguous.”
Response: Uncertain
Chad Syverson, Chicago Booth
“Schedule I for marijuana is a decades-old mistake that created massive enforcement costs (direct and spillover). Moving away from it helps. Further moves in that direction may be optimal.”
Response: Strongly agree
More from Chicago Booth Review
Inflation Affects Behavior Decades after Prices Have Stabilized
Hyperinflation in 1920s Germany set off ripples that persist a century later.
Inflation Affects Behavior Decades after Prices Have Stabilized
Capitalisn’t: Raghuram Rajan’s Vision of an Indian Path to Development
Chicago Booth’s Raghuram G. Rajan explains why India’s strengths play to services-based development.
Capitalisn’t: Raghuram Rajan’s Vision of an Indian Path to DevelopmentMore from Chicago Booth
Your Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.