How quickly do you spot a car slamming on its brakes, a coffee cup tipping over, or a friend waving hello?
The widely held view that humans immediately notice what’s in front of them is undoubtedly wrong, according to Chicago Booth’s Alexander Todorov and a team of researchers, who find that recognizing visual stimuli is neither instantaneous nor universal. “The brain prioritizes information for consciousness,” the researchers write, but every brain prioritizes differently, which leads some of us to process visual stimuli more quickly than others. Citing the results of a series of 10 experiments they conducted involving dozens of Hebrew University students, they report that there are meaningful differences in how quickly people see something.
The “something” in the experiments involved words and other stimuli such as numbers, human faces, and emotional expressions. The team conducted the tests to determine nonconscious visual prioritization speed, or NVPS. Participants looked through 3D glasses at flashing stimuli and were asked to press a button to indicate whether the stimulus image was to the left or the right.
But the researchers also used masks, generally colorful or busy images, to obscure the stimuli. In some experiments, the masks were shown constantly in one eye while the stimuli slowly showed up in the other. In other experiments, the masks were flashed at both eyes between stimuli images. For example, in one test, some participants saw a colorful square in the right eye while a human face slowly showed up in the left eye. The participants indicated where and when the face appeared.
A Q&A with Alexander Todorov, the Leon Carroll Marshall Professor of Behavioral Science at Chicago Booth.
You Can Shake a Bad First Impression
When people see more than one forecast, whether the predictions are expressed verbally or numerically changes how they're interpreted.
Numbers or Words? How Predictions Are Presented to Us Affects How We Combine ThemThe researchers find no correlation between the speed at which people notice an object and similar cognitive traits such as conscious cognitive speed, perceptual threshold (the point at which some stimulus breaks through consciousness), visual short-term memory, and attentiveness. They do, however, find a moderate correlation between self-reported sensitivity and NVPS, via a shortened version of the highly sensitive person test (a checklist test posing statements that include “I am deeply moved by the arts or music” and “I notice and enjoy delicate or fine scents, tastes, sounds, and works of art”). The researchers theorize that how quickly people process visual stimuli may affect how they experience the world.
Other implications could be that those who quickly notice visual stimuli may be more aware of their surroundings—and be better able to quickly reach out and keep that cup of coffee from tipping over. Those who take longer to process visual stimuli might crash into the braking car in front of them or only respond to a wave after the friend has turned away. However, those who react more quickly might also take less time to think and thus may make less deliberate decisions, the researchers suggest.
Asael Sklar, Ariel Goldstein, Yaniv Abir, Alon Goldstein, Ron Dotsch, Alexander Todorov, and Ran Hassin, “Did You See It? Robust Individual Differences in the Speed with Which Meaningful Visual Stimuli Break Suppression,” Cognition, February 2021.
A series of studies suggests an inverse relationship between automation and religiosity.
Where AI Thrives, Religion May Struggle
A different framework could help confront misinformation.
We Need a New Way to Talk about Lying
When choosing between two pools of resources, people tend to strategically select the smaller one.
Why We Have Trouble Winning at ‘Pool-Choice’ Strategy GamesYour Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.