An Argument for Less Debate
For better understanding and decision-making, try dialogue instead.
An Argument for Less DebateAcademic models are often built on assumptions about how rational, utility-maximizing individuals would behave. But as behavioral scientists have long pointed out, real people don’t actually behave that way. Does that mean that we behave irrationally, and if so why? Or is our behavior actually more rational than it may appear? In this special episode, we present Chicago Booth’s Richard H. Thaler, an economics Nobel laureate, in conversation with Harvard’s Steven Pinker.
Transcript not yet available
For better understanding and decision-making, try dialogue instead.
An Argument for Less DebatePeople are just as impatient when it comes to paying money as receiving it.
Why Paying Off Your Debt Sooner May Cost You MoreThe implications of ‘surprised elaboration’ can be profoundly consequential.
Stereotypes Skew How Much We Say about MisfortuneYour Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.