Healthcare and the Moral Hazard Problem
The demand curve isn’t simple when lives are on the line.
Healthcare and the Moral Hazard ProblemPeter Arkle
Among families with more than one child, what factors do parents prioritize when investing time and money in education? A team of researchers including Chicago Booth’s Rebecca Dizon-Ross finds that while parents want to maximize the return on this investment, they also care very much about allocating their resources equally among their children. In an experiment with 300 families, children took a test and earned a monetary reward determined on the basis of their scores. Beforehand, the researchers asked parents to allocate 10 tickets to two of their children in a lottery where only one child in the family would win an hour of tutoring. Given the opportunity to favor one child—whether helping one who was further behind academically or boosting one who was already excelling—the parents overall showed a strong aversion to allocating tickets unequally. To learn more about this research, read “Do Parents Play Favorites When Investing in Kids?”
Adapted from the researchers’ paper, “Not Playing Favorites: An Experiment on Parental Fairness Preferences”
Illustration by Peter Arkle
James Berry, Rebecca Dizon-Ross, and Maulik Jagnani, “Not Playing Favorites: An Experiment on Parental Fairness Preferences,” Working paper, June 2020.
The demand curve isn’t simple when lives are on the line.
Healthcare and the Moral Hazard ProblemThe podcast explores questions at the heart of recent campus protests—and university governance.
Capitalisn’t: The Economics of Student ProtestsChicago Booth’s Sendhil Mullainathan visits the podcast to discuss if AI is really “intelligent” and whether a profit motive is always bad.
Capitalisn’t: Who Controls AI?Your Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.