The modest decline in US inflation during the Great Recession surprised many economists, sparking what’s been coined the missing deflation puzzle. With GDP contracting so strongly and unemployment hitting 10 percent, inflation should have dropped more severely, at least according to traditional Phillips curve models.
But the downturn’s deflation wasn’t necessarily missing. Rather, consumers changed their buying habits in a way not captured in the Consumer Price Index data, argues Omiros Kouvavas, University of Warwick PhD candidate.
The issue is due to what the literature calls trading down. When times are tough, consumers have the option either to buy less of a product or to buy cheaper versions of it. Kouvavas posits that during economic downturns such as the Great Recession, consumers choose cheaper products, such as generic versus name-brand goods. The reverse, he finds, is true during times of expansion, when consumers choose more-expensive brands.
It was these changes in consumption behavior that partially account for the low deflation rates seen during the Great Recession, as well as the modest inflationary increases during the recovery. If, as his research suggests, the business cycle leads to trading up or down in quality, this can bias the measurement of observed aggregate inflation, Kouvavas argues.
He cautions that it is difficult to extrapolate his findings to the present. “The current inflation dynamics are driven by supply-side constraints, which will have an impact also on the ability of people to trade up or down,” he says. Thus, a pattern he sees in normal economic cycles might not apply to the most recent years.