Avoiding the risk of immediate failure can lower the odds of long-term success.
Avoiding an immediate loss at the expense of one’s ultimate goal can happen outside of sports. Think of a struggling business, and imagine there is a strategy that provides a better chance of surviving in the long run but would increase the chance of going under right now. That business might be reluctant to take the risk.
Or think about cover-ups. There is an immediate cost to saying “I made a mistake.” But if you think through the consequences of a cover-up and the chance of getting caught, you might realize that fessing up right now gives you a better chance to get through the ordeal.
People are focused on what’s happening right now and they’re more scared about losses than excited about gains. The myopia can be counteracted by taking a broader view. In sports, the goal is not to get to overtime; it’s to win the game. Force yourself into a broader perspective.
There’s another explanation for this tendency, a more magical-thinking one: risks you don’t have to take seem riskier than risks you have to take. So think, if this were your only option, how would you evaluate your chance of success and failure? Now with those estimates in mind, do you want to do it?
Jane L. Risen is professor of behavioral science and John E. Jeuck Faculty Fellow at Chicago Booth.
Framing changes how different people answer the question.
How Much Should Facebook Pay You for Your Data?
What are the mental connections we’re making between various expenses, and how can understanding them help us make better decisions?
Are You Shopping Irrationally?
A Q&A with Chicago Booth’s Abigail Sussman about why budgets, and diets, often fail.
Why It’s So Easy to Rationalize a SplurgeYour Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.