When a retail chain such as Sears is in trouble—and Sears is in trouble, by its own admission—the usual levers to examine to improve performance are location, assortment, price, and, most importantly, the overall quality of merchandise.
Over the years, Sears has tried to move the needle by engaging each of these levers. For example, it experimented with location by opening a store in downtown Chicago in 2001, to serve the clientele coming to that area to shop at neighboring stores including Macy’s, Old Navy, Gap, and Target. But the downtown store failed to generate enough traffic and sales to justify the premium location, and Sears closed it in 2014. It also experimented with assortment when it tried to return to its catalog roots by acquiring Lands’ End, a higher-end clothing, luggage, and home-furnishings catalog retailer. That did not end well either: Sears spun off Lands’ End in 2013.
Back in 1989, Sears tried to move from a high-low pricing policy, where merchandise sells at a higher regular price coupled with occasional discounts of varying depths, to an everyday-low-price strategy, where stores have lower regular prices but offer fewer discounts. This also resulted in failure, as the customer who came to Sears missed feeling the thrill of having discovered a quality product at a low price.
So over the years, Sears has been declining. It lost out to Walmart and Target in the bricks-and-mortar era, unable to compete with Walmart at the lower end and Target at the slightly upper end. More recently, the online assault mounted by Amazon.com has largely decimated what was left of the “Great American Store.”
Unlike many other retail chains, however, Sears owns several brands that are well known and trusted by American consumers. These include Kenmore appliances, Craftsman tools, and DieHard car batteries. Recently the company sought to raise money by selling these iconic brands. It sold the Craftsman brand to Stanley Black & Decker, another, larger tools manufacturer. While Craftsman products will still be available in Sears stores, ownership will pass to the purchasing company.
Sears has also been interested in selling Kenmore. Clearly there are other manufacturers—including Whirlpool, Electrolux (a Swedish manufacturer), Haier (a Chinese appliance maker), and Samsung and LG (Korean manufacturers)—that could potentially be interested in acquiring the Kenmore name. Obviously there are financial, operational, and other considerations that go into the decision to acquire a brand. Here, to analyze that decision, I take a limited perspective by focusing on the consumer to see if the Kenmore brand provides a good “fit” for these other players; ignoring the two big Korean manufacturers from the analysis, since these are large conglomerates with interests well beyond appliances; and looking at what consumers say on a specific social-media platform, Twitter. Limiting my analysis to one platform provides an incomplete picture, but also some insights.
I looked at data from the two-month period from November 7, 2016, to January 7, 2017, and I began by looking at “buzz,” the amount of activity being generated on Twitter by the various brands. Kenmore is generating buzz, so if you are a brand that is currently not front and center in the consumers’ minds, it might be beneficial for you to acquire Kenmore to increase “top of mind” awareness.
We see that Whirlpool and its subsidiary Maytag already control over half of all the conversations in this market. So while adding Kenmore to the mix would significantly expand coverage, it would provide less of a benefit to Whirlpool than it would to another manufacturer (but since Whirlpool already manufactures some Kenmore products, an acquisition argument could be made from an operations perspective). Both Electrolux and Haier would benefit significantly from adding Kenmore to their portfolios, as they currently have very little buzz—or access to the US market.