Glen Gyssler
In the 2016 US presidential campaign, immigration has reaffirmed its status as one of the most prominent wedge issues in American politics. More often than not, the campaign-trail conversation has focused on illegal immigration—but the candidates disagree on policies for legal immigration, too. On the Democratic side, Hillary Clinton has proposed increasing the number of immigrants with advanced degrees in STEM fields by “stapling” green cards to their PhDs. Her plan may sound familiar to political observers—both Mitt Romney and President Barack Obama have suggested similar policies. By contrast, Republican nominee Donald Trump wants to modify the H-1B visa program to increase the prevailing wage for foreign workers, while also requiring companies to hire American workers first.
Refugees may be the secret to long-term economic growth.
The Economic Case for Accepting Refugees
The United States’ 2016 presidential primaries have yielded a bumper crop of commentary from political observers.
What Economists Think about Voting
The factors that led to Brexit and the outcomes we can expect from it.
The Big Question: What Will Brexit Mean for Europe?What do economists anticipate would happen if US companies were allowed to hire more highly skilled immigrants? Chicago Booth’s Initiative on Global Markets asked its expert panel how an increase in immigrants with advanced STEM degrees would affect American wages in the short run, and per capita income in the long run. Nearly all agreed that over time, welcoming these elite foreign workers would pay off.
Larry Samuelson, Yale
“One would expect a temporary decrease in the premium, but it is not obvious that the effect would be significant or long-lasting.”
Response: Agree
Darrell Duffie, Stanford
“The short-run story is supply-versus-demand. In the long run, high-skill immigration could perhaps increase demand for high-skill workers.”
Response: Agree
Markus Brunnermeier, Princeton
“Highly skilled researchers create positive spillovers and make the overall environment more productive, which can boost other skilled workers.”
Response: Uncertain
Kenneth Judd, Stanford
“Any effect would be tiny at any politically feasible level of such immigration.”
Response: Disagree
Steve Kaplan, Chicago Booth
“More highly skilled immigrants here, more jobs here, more income here, generate more jobs in services and more innovation.”
Response: Strongly agree
Larry Samuelson, Yale
“The ability to bring the best and brightest from throughout the world to our economy is a great resource.”
Response: Strongly agree
Austan D. Goolsbee, Chicago Booth
“See under ‘History, American.’”
Response: Strongly agree
David Autor, MIT
“Much US wealth comes from innovation, and foreign-born STEM workers are a huge contributor to that effort.”
Response: Agree
José Scheinkman, Princeton
“Disclosure: I benefited from a policy that allowed universities to hire foreign nationals with advanced degrees to their faculty.”
Response: Agree
Harvard’s Dani Rodrik visits the podcast to discuss changing attitudes toward globalization.
Capitalisn’t: The New Economics of Industrial Policy
Bring on the consumption tax.
It’s Time the US Abolished the Income Tax
Conventional economic analysis of slavery overlooks the costs imposed upon the people who were enslaved.
Emancipation May Have Generated the Largest Economic Gains in US HistoryYour Privacy
We want to demonstrate our commitment to your privacy. Please review Chicago Booth's privacy notice, which provides information explaining how and why we collect particular information when you visit our website.